{"id":682,"date":"2014-12-31T15:16:04","date_gmt":"2014-12-31T02:16:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/?p=682"},"modified":"2014-12-31T15:16:04","modified_gmt":"2014-12-31T02:16:04","slug":"is-gym-movement-biofeedback-nonsense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/bodybuilding-2\/is-gym-movement-biofeedback-nonsense.php","title":{"rendered":"Is Gym Movement Biofeedback Nonsense?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/share\" class=\"twitter-share-button\" data-via=\"gareththomasnz\" data-count=\"vertical\" data-url=\"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/bodybuilding-2\/is-gym-movement-biofeedback-nonsense.php\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n<p>It sure looks like nonsense &#8211; and I didnt try it out yet. Its also definitely NOT Biofeedback &#8211; here is my rant&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Applied kinesiology<br \/>\n(AK) is a term used to describe the manual<br \/>\nmuscle testing diagnostics primarily<br \/>\ndeveloped by Goodheart (1964). Goodheart<br \/>\ntook classic manual muscle testing and<br \/>\nmoulded it into a precise diagnostic tool.<br \/>\nPrior to him, muscle testing was used<br \/>\nprimarily to diagnose motor nerve<br \/>\npathology and assess recovery during and<br \/>\nfollowing therapy. He astutely observed<br \/>\nchanges in muscle resistance patterns in<br \/>\nthe absence of motor nerve pathology.<br \/>\nWhat he discovered was that disturbances<br \/>\nanywhere in the body would lead to<br \/>\nchanges in normal muscle contraction<br \/>\npatterns. The main and most notable<br \/>\nchange from the past was that the muscle<br \/>\ntest became less an assessment of<br \/>\ncontractile strength and more an<br \/>\nassessment of proprioception, spinal and<br \/>\ncentral nervous system regulation and<br \/>\nthe effects they have on neuromuscular<br \/>\nfunction.<br \/>\nStrengthening a weakened muscle by<br \/>\nexercise is only sensible and efficient if<br \/>\nneuromuscular, proprioceptive control of<br \/>\nthe muscle is intact. Usually, it is not the<br \/>\nloss of strength in a muscle that is most<br \/>\nimportant, but a degrading of normal<br \/>\nneuromuscular function both within<br \/>\nand between individual muscles that is<br \/>\nresponsible for the greatest number of<br \/>\ndisturbances. AK is the only available<br \/>\nmethod that allows for a clinical diagnosis<br \/>\nof this type of dysfunction.<\/p>\n<p>The Muscle Test Handbook- Functional Assessment, Myofascial Trigger Points and Meridian Relationships<\/p>\n<p>Neuromuscular Functional Assessment (NFA)<br \/>\nseries by this author (at this printing<br \/>\navailable only in German) and in Walther\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s<br \/>\nclassical Applied Kinesiology, Synopsis<br \/>\n(Walther 2000) or the flow chart manual by<br \/>\nLeaf (1996)<\/p>\n<p>OK this is NOT biofeedback &#8211; it is very crude applied kinesiology which is a very complicated methodology in proffessional practise<\/p>\n<p>Is it a valid technique? possibly &#8211; Does it do the same thing as biofeedback? &#8211; no<\/p>\n<p>Biofeedback &#038; applied kinesiology can however compliment each other nicely &#8211;<br \/>\nalso biofeedback devices &#038; protocols could be adapted to measure the<br \/>\nApplied Kinesiology physiological parameters which would be far more efficient and technologically sound.<\/p>\n<p>Biofeedback can be used to alter the underlying physiology and change the response to AK muscle testing &#8211;<br \/>\nhence enabling the practise of selected exercises that would have otherwise shown a pathological response.<\/p>\n<p>I think used together the two are potential dynamite.<\/p>\n<p>My issues with the Gym Movement book are&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>1. He claims biofeedback has only been used in the past by athletes to detect over training.<\/p>\n<p>This is nonsense. Biofeedback is primarily used to autoregulate. To alter relaxation, enhance meditation &#038; visualization,<br \/>\nand as an adjunct to autogenics and hypnosis. Autogenics itself goes far deeper than mere relaxation as that is only the<br \/>\npreliminary stage. Read the original text books by shultz.<\/p>\n<p>So the uses of biofeedback for athletes are many.<\/p>\n<p>2. He claims his methods are advanced biofeedback &#8211; no his methods are Applied Kinesiology.<\/p>\n<p>Probably something less advanced than biofeedback.<\/p>\n<p>3. He says to follow your body signals and do not try and model yourself into something you are not.<\/p>\n<p>This to my mind was the most pathetic thing in the book. Defeatism and he bases it upon the initial misnomer of<br \/>\ncalling applied kinesiology biofeedback.<\/p>\n<p>With biofeedback you can alter your physiology and hence the response to AK tests and genuinely perform better as a consequence.<\/p>\n<p>You can indeed achieve greater goals or models. Much greater in fact.<\/p>\n<p>Despite these misgivings the concept of using applied kinesiology testing to enhance training is sound and many appear to be<br \/>\ngetting great results. I&#8217;m sure by integrating this with real biofeedback &#038; psychological techniques like hypnosis &#038; autogenics<br \/>\neven more incredible things can be achieved by athletes.<\/p>\n<p>But please lets stop calling applied kinesiology biofeedback &#038; lets stop discounting real high tech biofeedback techniques.<\/p>\n<p>Questions that remain to be answered &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Just how do crude ROM tests or grip tests indicate a more optimal training approach?<\/p>\n<p>How could real biofeedback &#038; other modalities be used to alter the testing response to match a goal with reguard to exercise selection?<\/p>\n<p>Can a strong result on a ROM test actaully indicate a weakness in antagonistic muscles which would actually signal not to train?<\/p>\n<p>If the results from ROM testing are as good as claimed how can it be explained scientifically &#038; improved?<\/p>\n<p>Basically I am skeptical &#8211; but keen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tweet It sure looks like nonsense &#8211; and I didnt try it out yet. Its also definitely NOT Biofeedback &#8211; here is my rant&#8230; Applied kinesiology (AK) is a term used to describe the manual muscle testing diagnostics primarily developed by Goodheart (1964). Goodheart took classic manual muscle testing and moulded it into a precise [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[574,575],"class_list":["post-682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bodybuilding-2","tag-gym-movement","tag-muscle-testing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=682"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1309,"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682\/revisions\/1309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freefitnessguru.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}